Whoever the allocator, the same standard.
Institutions, family offices, corporate occupiers, private investors and families each weigh a different question. The evidence is built around theirs.
Funds and institutions
Institutional investors
Evidence ahead of each allocation.
Institutional allocations are examined by many people and held for many years. Every assumption is stated, so the findings can be checked line by line.
Starts with
The brief
An allocation under review: the asset, the underwriting inputs the committee uses, and the horizon it is held over.
Assembled
The evidence
Comparable transactions, lease and tenant data, absorption and supply, with a stress test and scenario analysis of the downside.
Delivered as
The findings
A written assessment structured for an investment committee, with every assumption stated.
Measures
Read in these terms
Single and multi-family
Family offices
A clear reading of assets held for the long term.
Family capital is patient, and the questions differ. The findings are set out in plain terms, for the principal and for the family.
Starts with
The brief
An asset, or a question of allocation: how it sits against what the family holds, and the horizon the family thinks in.
Assembled
The evidence
Income across cycles, market depth, and how the asset compares with the other holdings.
Delivered as
The findings
Findings in plain terms for the principal, with a fuller schedule for the family office team.
Measures
Read in these terms
Corporate real estate
Corporate occupiers
Evidence for the property a business runs from.
Headquarters, logistics and operating property turn on cost, location and flexibility as much as price.
Starts with
The brief
A site or a property decision: the footprint, the horizon, and the cost the business can carry.
Assembled
The evidence
Market rents, total occupancy cost, supply, incentives and the depth of demand for the location.
Delivered as
The findings
A comparison of sites against the market, set out for the board or the property committee.
Measures
Read in these terms
HNWI and UHNWI
Private investors
Downside, income and price, before capital is committed.
When personal capital is deployed, the asking price is only one side’s number. The decision rests on the evidence.
Starts with
The brief
A property or project on the table, and the objective behind it: income, growth or both.
Assembled
The evidence
The downside case, the income after costs, and the price against comparable transactions.
Delivered as
The findings
A written assessment, presented by Statepolitan, with questions answered directly.
Measures
Read in these terms
Preservation and succession
Private families
Income, depth and price for property held across generations.
Property held for a family’s long term is judged by its resilience, not its next price.
Starts with
The brief
Property held, or considered, for the long term: what it must do, and for whom.
Assembled
The evidence
How the income behaves when conditions turn, how deep the market is, and how the asset compares with the alternatives.
Delivered as
The findings
Plain-language findings the whole family can follow, with the assumptions written beneath each.
Measures
Read in these terms
What every client receives.
The same four things, whatever the asset and whoever the client.
Findings
A written assessment
Downside, income, market and entry basis, with every assumption stated.
Presentation
Presented in person
We present the findings and answer questions directly.
Method
One stated method
Every assumption is stated, and every assessment is built the same way.
Confidence
Discretion
Objectives, holdings and enquiries remain private.
